Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
This audit is a structured, clinical-first evaluation designed to support executive decision-making around AI use in healthcare. It provides a clear view of readiness, risk exposure, and governance maturity — with practical recommendations aligned to regulatory, clinical, and operational realities.
We assess where AI interacts with clinical workflows, patient safety, documentation, and decision-making — identifying areas where automation may introduce risk or reduce quality of care.
We evaluate medication workflows, prescribing, verification, dispensing, and monitoring processes to identify AI-related risks, error amplification, and inappropriate automation.
We assess how patient data is collected, processed, and governed, including HIPAA exposure, auditability, consent boundaries, and vendor risk.
We identify where AI can realistically reduce cost or burden — and where projected ROI is overstated or structurally unsound.
We evaluate leadership alignment, clinical acceptance, staffing impact, and change-management risk — the most common cause of AI failure in healthcare.
Our audit follows a disciplined, healthcare-safe process focused on clarity, risk reduction, and executive decision support — not technology hype.
1. Intake & Context Review
We begin with a focused intake to understand your organization’s clinical environment, operational priorities, regulatory exposure, and current or proposed AI use cases.
2. Workflow & Risk Mapping
We examine where AI interacts with clinical workflows, medication-use processes, documentation, and decision-making — identifying points of risk, fragility, or misalignment.
3. Clinical, Data & Regulatory Review
We assess patient safety implications, data governance practices, HIPAA exposure, vendor risk, and regulatory readiness across affected workflows.
4. Executive Findings & Decision Guidance
You receive a clear, executive-ready summary outlining where AI is appropriate, where it introduces unacceptable risk, and where initiatives should be paused, redesigned, or avoided.

This audit is designed for healthcare leaders accountable for clinical safety, regulatory compliance, and operational decision-making, including:
• Hospital and health system executives
• Clinical leadership (CMO, CMIO, Nursing leadership)
• Pharmacy leadership and medication safety teams
• Compliance, risk, and quality departments
• Health IT and digital transformation leaders
This is not a technology sales engagement. It is an independent, clinical-first
assessment designed to support safe, informed decisions.
This audit is intentionally designed to be independent, objective, and clinically grounded. It is not:
This assessment exists to help leaders pause, evaluate, and decide responsibly — before
investing capital, changing workflows, or introducing risk into clinical environments.
At the conclusion of the audit, your organization receives clear, executive-ready outputs designed to support informed decision-making:
The audit follows a disciplined, clinical-first process designed to minimize disruption while delivering clarity.
1. Intake & Context Review
We begin with a focused intake to understand your organization’s clinical environment, operational priorities, regulatory exposure, and current or proposed AI use cases.
2. Workflow & Risk Mapping
We examine where AI interacts with clinical workflows, medication-use processes, documentation, and decision-making — identifying points of risk, fragility, or misalignment.
3. Clinical, Data & Regulatory Review
We assess patient safety implications, data governance practices, HIPAA exposure, vendor risk, and regulatory readiness across affected workflows.
4. Executive Findings & Decision Guidance
You receive a clear, executive-ready summary outlining where AI is appropriate, where it introduces unacceptable risk, and where initiatives should proceed, pause, or be avoided.
The audit is designed to minimize operational disruption while providing meaningful clarity.
Timeframe
Most audits are completed within 2–4 weeks, depending on organizational size and scope.
Leadership Involvement
Engagement is typically limited to:
Operational Impact
No workflow changes, system access, or data migrations are required.
The audit does not involve shadowing clinicians or interrupting patient care.
Internal Resources Required
You may be asked to share:
This process is designed to respect clinical time and executive bandwidth.
Most AI initiatives in healthcare fail not because of technology — but because risk, workflow, and clinical reality are assessed too late.
This audit is different by design:
This is a decision-support assessment, not a sales engagement.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.